← Back to Writing

November 2025

How Infrastructure Founders Built Generational Wealth

How infrastructure founders built generational wealth. Time to exit, ownership stakes, strategic decisions, and the compounding effect of patience.

Infrastructure founders don't get the headlines.

No magazine covers. No keynote speeches at consumer tech conferences. No viral Twitter threads about growth hacks.

But they build generational wealth.

I've studied dozens of infrastructure exits. The pattern is clear: patient capital, technical depth, and compounding moats create the largest founder payouts.

Here's how they did it.

Patrick and John Collison (Stripe): $50B+ Valuation

The Collison brothers started Stripe in 2010. Fourteen years later, it's valued at $50B+. They still own a significant stake (estimated 15-20% combined). That's $7.5B-$10B+ in founder wealth.

They didn't exit. They built. Stripe processed $1T+ in payment volume in 2023. Revenue: ~$16B. They could have sold to PayPal, Square, or any major bank years ago. They didn't.

The strategy: own the financial operating system for internet businesses. Start with payments. Add billing, fraud detection, tax compliance, banking APIs, revenue recognition. Make it impossible to leave.

Patient capital compounds. Stripe raised at higher valuations each round because the moat got deeper. The longer they waited, the more valuable it became.

Nat Friedman (GitHub): $7.5B Exit to Microsoft

GitHub sold to Microsoft for $7.5B in 2018. Nat Friedman (former CEO) and the founding team built the default platform for software development. 28 million developers. Every modern engineering workflow ran through GitHub.

The wealth creation: GitHub raised ~$350M total. The $7.5B exit returned 21x to investors. Founders and early employees who held equity through the exit captured life-changing wealth.

The moat: switching costs measured in organizational inertia. Pull requests, code review, CI/CD pipelines, package management. Ripping out GitHub meant retraining entire engineering organizations.

Microsoft paid for developer mindshare and the ability to influence how software gets built. Infrastructure that becomes workflow is infrastructure that gets acquired at premium multiples.

Olivier Pomel and Alexis Lê-Quôc (Datadog): $40B+ Public Market Cap

Datadog went public in 2019 at a $10.9B valuation. Today it's worth $40B+. The founders still own significant stakes. Pomel (CEO) owns ~6%, worth $2.4B+. Lê-Quôc (CTO) owns similar.

They built observability infrastructure with 130% net revenue retention. Customers start at $15/host/month, grow to $500K+/year as infrastructure scales. Revenue grows automatically. No upsell motion required.

The wealth creation: they stayed public. Datadog's market cap grew 4x post-IPO because the business model works. Usage-based pricing that scales with customer growth creates compounding value.

Infrastructure founders who go public and hold equity through growth capture more wealth than those who exit early. The trade-off: more risk, more time, more operational burden. The reward: generational wealth.

Dev Ittycheria (MongoDB): $25B+ Public Market Cap

MongoDB went public in 2017 at a $1.6B valuation. Today it's worth $25B+. Dev Ittycheria (CEO) joined in 2014 and took the company public. He owns ~1.5%, worth $375M+.

MongoDB grew revenue 30%+ annually for seven straight years. The database is the hardest infrastructure layer to migrate. Once production data lives in MongoDB, switching requires schema redesign, application rewrites, and zero-downtime data migration.

Most companies never switch. MongoDB Atlas (managed cloud service) has 10x better unit economics than self-hosted. Customers start free, grow to $500K+/year as data scales.

The wealth creation: patient capital and compounding moats. MongoDB could have sold to Oracle, AWS, or Microsoft. They stayed independent and built something worth more than any acquisition offer.

Mitchell Hashimoto and Armon Dadgar (HashiCorp): $6.4B Exit to IBM

HashiCorp sold to IBM for $6.4B in 2024. The founders built infrastructure automation tools (Terraform, Vault, Consul) that managed 300M+ infrastructure resources globally.

The wealth creation: HashiCorp raised ~$350M total. The $6.4B exit returned 18x to investors. Founders who held equity through the exit captured significant wealth.

The strategy: open source adoption created enterprise pipeline. Developers used Terraform for free. When they joined companies, they brought HashiCorp with them. Enterprises paid for governance, security, and support.

Once infrastructure is defined in Terraform, migrating to another tool means rewriting the entire infrastructure codebase. IBM bought the installed base and the switching costs.

The Pattern

Infrastructure founders build generational wealth through patient capital, technical depth, and compounding moats. They don't chase quick exits. They build systems that become essential.

The wealth comes from ownership stakes held through growth. Whether through acquisition (GitHub, HashiCorp) or public markets (Stripe, Datadog, MongoDB), the founders who capture the most value are the ones who wait.

Time compounds. Switching costs increase. Integration depth grows. The longer you hold, the more valuable it becomes. Infrastructure that becomes workflow becomes wealth.

What This Means for Founders

If you're building infrastructure, optimize for long-term value creation. High gross margins. Usage-based pricing. Negative churn. Mission-critical positioning. Technical depth that competitors can't replicate quickly.

Don't optimize for quick exits. Optimize for compounding moats. The founders who build generational wealth are the ones who turn down early acquisition offers and build something worth 10x more five years later.

Patient capital wins in infrastructure. The question isn't whether to exit. It's whether you're building something valuable enough to wait for.

Jarred Taylor

Capital at the inflection.